The Anonymous Power

The mechanism of power and control in our society never stops. This blog post is to address some key issues discussed in Foucault's article. In addition to the function of discipling which is already well recognized, the conversation between Barou, Perrot and Foucault brings up the deeper political meaning behind the design of Panopticon per se. It is apparent that an analogy can be set up between the prison and the city under the cameras system, both of which being a model of political organization under a centralized observation. Here, it is the sovereign power that matters. Through the scholars' discussion, it seems to me that Bentham, the inventor of this surveillance design, considers it as the innovation needed for the "easy and effective exercise of power", based on the assumption of an existing power structure. In this case, both spaces in prison and city become specified and functional, due to a series of social problems arise with the new century of social orders. In our case, all sorts of the cameras arrangements are subjected to control. In another word, the control and discipline of population is considered prior to anything else. The population, or the community does not really contribute to the decision-making process, and this is because they lose their rights of participation at the point that they are recognized as the passive side. Just as Betham acclaims that, "he invented a technology of power designed to solve the problems of surveillance", to make it easier and more effective.